You are visitor number: 28801
From Affiliated Egyptian Universities and Cardiology Centers

Clinical Article

Does the Admission HB1c Level Have an Impact on the Size of Myocardial Infarction and Residual Viability in Type II Diabetics Surviving Their 1st Myocardial Infarction?

Rayan M, MD.

Background: Hyperglycemia is strongly associated with increased mortality in type II diabetic patients, hence, the simple message used to be "The lower, the better." But, the release of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) data cast doubt on this and has provoked deliberation ever since. The trial was halted prematurely because of an increased risk of death in patients who underwent intensive blood glucose lowering.
Methods: We included 300 patients with type II diabetes who survived their 1st time myocardial infarction who were kept on the same type of medication Only patients, who received thrombolytic therapy and were maintained on the same antidiabetic therapy for at least 3 months before the infarction, were included. Assessment for other risk factors was done to all included patients such as gender, hypertension, smoking and dyslipidemia. Infarction size and residual viability were assessed using rest–Trimetazidine Tc99m Sestamibi SPECT imaging.
Results: We found a bimodal U shaped behavior of glycated hemoglobin, where the extremely high and low levels of Hb1c were associated with large infarction size as compared to middle levels. And that high LDL levels was strongly associated with larger size of infarction and less viability. Other risk factors did not show a strong influence on the infarction size or viability.
Conclusions: We concluded that extremely over or under control of blood glucose ,as reflected by HB1c level, is associated with increased infarction size and reduced residual viability and that optimal therapy for diabetics should address not only glycemic control, but also the coexisting risk factors especially LDL levels.
Keywords: Hb1c, infarction size, viability, Tc99m Sestamibi
(Heart Mirror J 2009; 3(2): 76-79).